Citation Numbers: 110 A.2d 54, 17 N.J. 40
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 12/13/1954
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 3/3/2016
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Harrison F. Durand argued the cause for the appellants, cross-respondents (Mr. Doane Twombly of counsel).
Mr. Frederick K. Hopkins argued the cause for the respondents, cross-appellants (Messrs. Hopkins, Vorburger and Dickson, attorneys).
Mr. Ronald A. Gulick argued the cause for the respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Chancery Division of the Superior Court is affirmed as to the matters appealed from *41 for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in that court by Judge Ewart and reported at 33 N.J. Super. 242.
We find no merit in the cross-appeal from the award of counsel fees. The trustees raised the question of the construction of the will in their complaint and there was clearly reasonable doubt as to its meaning. We affirm the trial court's decision on this point.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN 7.
For reversal None.
Martin v. Cestone , 33 N.J. Super. 267 ( 1954 )
Danelczyk v. Tynek , 260 N.J. Super. 426 ( 1992 )
United States v. Kingsley , 41 N.J. 75 ( 1963 )
Johnson v. Johnson , 212 N.J. Super. 368 ( 1986 )
Matter of Estate of Yablick , 218 N.J. Super. 91 ( 1987 )
Robbins v. National Bank of Ga. , 241 Ga. 538 ( 1978 )