Citation Numbers: 247 A.2d 129, 52 N.J. 536
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 11/4/1968
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 8/28/2023
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Charles M. Egan, Jr., argued the cause for third-party plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant (Messrs. Egan, O'Donnell, Hanley and Clifford, attorneys).
Mr. Mark D. Larner argued the cause for third-party defendant-appellant and cross-respondent (Messrs. Budd, Larner, Kent and Gross, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
These cross-appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Division, 103 N.J. Super. 201, 247 A.2d 20, (1967), relate to the issue of policy coverage. For the reasons given in the majority opinion, we agree there is a triable issue as to whether the work was completed, and hence the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and HANEMAN 6.
For reversal None.
Dodd v. COPELAND , 52 N.J. 537 ( 1968 )
Richard v. Johnson , 234 N.W.2d 22 ( 1975 )
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services , 204 N.J. 320 ( 2010 )
Gaido v. Weiser , 227 N.J. Super. 175 ( 1988 )
Gottlieb v. Newark Ins. Co. , 238 N.J. Super. 531 ( 1990 )
Ricciardi v. Bernasconi , 105 N.J. Super. 525 ( 1969 )
USF&G CO. v. Greater Essex Sec., Inc. , 248 N.J. Super. 105 ( 1991 )
Continental Nat. American Group v. Pluda , 115 N.J. Super. 206 ( 1971 )
Morton Intern. v. General Acc. Ins. , 266 N.J. Super. 300 ( 1991 )
Comorote v. MASSEY , 110 N.J. Super. 124 ( 1970 )
Reliance Ins. v. Armstrong W. Ind. , 259 N.J. Super. 538 ( 1992 )
Central Nat. v. Utica Nat. , 232 N.J. Super. 467 ( 1989 )
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Armstrong World Ind. , 265 N.J. Super. 148 ( 1993 )