Citation Numbers: 247 A.2d 129, 52 N.J. 536, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 263
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 11/4/1968
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Charles M. Egan, Jr., argued the cause for third-party plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant (Messrs. Egan, O'Donnell, Hanley and Clifford, attorneys).
Mr. Mark D. Larner argued the cause for third-party defendant-appellant and cross-respondent (Messrs. Budd, Larner, Kent and Gross, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
These cross-appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Division, 103 N.J. Super. 201, 247 A.2d 20, (1967), relate to the issue of policy coverage. For the reasons given in the majority opinion, we agree there is a triable issue as to whether the work was completed, and hence the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and HANEMAN 6.
For reversal None.
West v. MACDONALD , 103 N.J. Super. 201 ( 1967 )
Ricciardi v. Bernasconi , 105 N.J. Super. 525 ( 1969 )
Reliance Ins. v. Armstrong W. Ind. , 259 N.J. Super. 538 ( 1992 )
USF&G CO. v. Greater Essex Sec., Inc. , 248 N.J. Super. 105 ( 1991 )
Central Nat. v. Utica Nat. , 232 N.J. Super. 467 ( 1989 )
Comorote v. MASSEY , 110 N.J. Super. 124 ( 1970 )
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Armstrong World Ind. , 265 N.J. Super. 148 ( 1993 )
Gottlieb v. Newark Ins. Co. , 238 N.J. Super. 531 ( 1990 )
Continental Nat. American Group v. Pluda , 115 N.J. Super. 206 ( 1971 )
Richard v. Johnson , 1975 N.D. LEXIS 129 ( 1975 )
Morton Intern. v. General Acc. Ins. , 266 N.J. Super. 300 ( 1991 )
Gaido v. Weiser , 227 N.J. Super. 175 ( 1988 )
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services , 204 N.J. 320 ( 2010 )