Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 2/22/1960
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mrs. Esther Strum Frankel argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Frankel & Frankel, attorneys).
Mr. Aaron Dines argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Louis Winer, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
Assuming the appellant's standing, we nonetheless affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division on the merits for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann in that court.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO 7.
For reversal None.
Dalli v. Board of Education ( 1971 )
M.A. VS. A.A. (FM-01-0537-18, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) ( 2021 )
EDWARD GRAY APTS./REGION NINE HOUSING CORP. v. Williams ( 2002 )
Muhlenberg Hospital v. Patterson ( 1974 )
Sanitary Vendors, Inc. v. Byrne ( 1962 )
Sprissler v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines ( 1965 )
John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital v. Heston ( 1971 )
Reiser v. Pension Commission, Passaic Cty. ( 1976 )
Essex Cty. Welfare Div. v. Harris ( 1983 )
DCPP VS. J.B. AND C.R., IN THE MATTER OF CA.R. AND C.R., JR.... ( 2019 )