Citation Numbers: 676 A.2d 1065, 144 N.J. 326, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 1223
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 6/11/1996
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Robert G. Engelhart argued the cause for appellant (Gebhardt & Kiefer, attorneys).
Raymond T. Sheldon argued the cause for respondent (Surdovel & Sheldon, attorneys).
*327 PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 277 N.J. Super. 448, 650 A.2d 1 (1994). We add that the coverage afforded under the policy is limited to the statutory coverage required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 in accordance with the holding in Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association, 144 N.J. 325, 676 A.2d 1064 (1996), also decided today.
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN 7.
Opposed None.
Marotta v. NJ AUTO. INS. UNDERWRITING ASSOC. , 144 N.J. 325 ( 1996 )
Dillard v. Hertz Claim Management , 277 N.J. Super. 448 ( 1994 )
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Lopez , 325 N.J. Super. 268 ( 1999 )
Zirger v. General Accident Insurance , 144 N.J. 327 ( 1996 )
Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. Lacroix , 194 N.J. 515 ( 2008 )
Thomas Demarco v. Sean Robert Stoddard, D.P.M. , 434 N.J. Super. 352 ( 2014 )
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Lopez , 311 N.J. Super. 660 ( 1998 )
Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co. v. LaCroix , 390 N.J. Super. 277 ( 2007 )