Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 5/2/1978
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Harold F. Kuskin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman and Spitzer, attorneys; Ms. M. Kathleen Duncan, on the brief).
Mr. Philip F. Mattia, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinions of the Appellate Division, reported at 151 N.J. Super. 14 (1977), and the Law Division, reported at 143 N.J. Super. 541 (1976).
For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER and Judge CONFORD 7.
For reversal None.
STATE BY COMM'R OF TRANSP. v. Charles Investment Corporation ( 1977 )
STATE BY COMMISSIONER OF TRANSP. v. Charles Investment ... ( 1976 )
STATE, BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. Faps Realty Corp. ( 1984 )
Com'r of Transp. v. Nat. Amusements ( 1990 )
STATE BY COM'R v. Weiswasser ( 1997 )
La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. Cummins ( 1986 )
State v. Van Nortwick ( 1995 )
Lima & Sons, Inc. v. Borough of Ramsey ( 1994 )
State v. Inhabitants of Phillipsburg ( 1990 )
State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Trans. v. Marlton Plaza ( 2012 )
STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. Van Nortwick ( 1992 )
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services ( 2010 )