Citation Numbers： 253 A.2d 545, 54 N.J. 93, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 461
Judges： Per Curiam
Filed Date： 6/2/1969
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/11/2024
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Remo M. Croce, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).
Mr. Victor Friedman argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Louis A. Smith on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division, 103 N.J. Super. 441.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN. 7.
For reversal None.
State v. DeLuca , 208 N.J. Super. 422 ( 1986 )
State v. Sweeney , 190 N.J. Super. 516 ( 1983 )
Bor. of Roselle v. Santone Const. Co., Inc. , 119 N.J. Super. 314 ( 1972 )
State of New Jersey v. Gale Sorensen , 439 N.J. Super. 471 ( 2015 )
State v. Sheppard , 125 N.J. Super. 332 ( 1973 )
State v. Tropea , 78 N.J. 309 ( 1978 )
State v. Higgins , 132 N.J. Super. 67 ( 1975 )
State v. Roenicke , 174 N.J. Super. 513 ( 1980 )
State v. Kraft , 134 N.J. Super. 416 ( 1975 )
State v. Ryan , 133 N.J. Super. 1 ( 1975 )
State v. Gonzalez , 186 N.J. Super. 609 ( 1982 )
State v. Kent , 391 N.J. Super. 352 ( 2007 )