Citation Numbers: 11 N.J. Misc. 237
Filed Date: 3/25/1933
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/25/2022
Judgment was entered by default in the Supreme Court on June 10th, 1931, in an action by Thomas J. Joyce against Milton P. Bauman for rent from October 1st, 1930, to May 31st, 1931. The defendant prosecutes a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant be permitted to enter a defense. The summons by which the rent action was instituted was tested and actually issued March 3d, 1931, one month before the accrual of the April rent and two months before the accrual of the May rent, assuming that the rental for three months did become due as alleged in the complaint.
Plaintiff alleges that the summons was served by being left with a colored maid at the usual place of abode of the defendant. Defendant denies the sufficiency of the writ and
The inclusion in the complaint of a right of action arising subsequent to the issue of the summons was, we think, clearly irregular. Also, the absence of the defendant, his wife and children from the residence over a period of seven months, the house being left unoccupied except by a maid as caretaker, was such as to raise a serious doubt whether the premises, during that interval — and it was during that period that the attempted service was had — constituted the defendant’s usual place of abode. The defendant has now appeared and submits to the jurisdiction of the court.
Our conclusion is that the rule should be made absolute to the extent that the judgment be opened, the defendant permitted to answer and the cause proceed regularly therefrom, costs to abide the event.