Woodman v. Bianchi

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ciiiee Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bobine, Donges, Yan Busktrtc, Deae, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeeety, JJ. l'L

For reversal — None.