Citation Numbers: 98 N.J.L. 887
Filed Date: 4/20/1923
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2022
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Heppenheimee, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 10.
For reversal — White, Van Buskirk, JJ. 2.