Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 4/10/2000
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
PER CURIAM.
Based on the partial dissent filed in the Appellate Division and reported at 318 N.J.Super. 361, 382, 724 A.2d 254 (1999), defendant filed an appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-1(a)(2). In respect of that appeal, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Steinberg's majority opinion, reported at 318 N.J.Super. 361, 724 A.2d 254 (1999).
For affirmanceChief Justice PORITZ and Associate Justices O'HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, and LaVECCHIA7.
OpposedNone. *1235
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOSHUA M. GRAHAM (17-05-0496, ... ( 2021 )
Klier v. Sordoni Skanska Const. Co. ( 2001 )
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TIMOTHY J. CANFIELD (16-12-3619, ... ( 2022 )
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. GERALD D. LAPHAN(14-09-0140, CAMDEN ... ( 2017 )
STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF F.W. (FJ-20-0191-18, ... ( 2020 )