Citation Numbers： 98 N.J. Eq. 412, 13 Stock. 412, 129 A. 922, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 612
Judges： PER CURIAM.
Filed Date： 5/18/1925
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/11/2024
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Kays, JJ. 9. ,
For reversal — White, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 4.
PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, ETC. VS. HARRY DAVIDOFF (C-... ( 2021 )
Bron v. Weintraub , 42 N.J. 87 ( 1964 )
Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co. , 10 N.J. Super. 545 ( 1950 )
Onderdonk v. Presbyterian Homes of NJ , 85 N.J. 171 ( 1981 )
Ward v. Ward , 96 Utah 263 ( 1938 )
Saxon Const. & Management Corp. v. Masterclean of North ... , 273 N.J. Super. 231 ( 1994 )
Lena v. Yannelli , 78 N.J. Super. 257 ( 1963 )
Warthen v. Toms River Community Mem. Hosp. , 199 N.J. Super. 18 ( 1985 )
Bower v. the Estaugh , 146 N.J. Super. 116 ( 1977 )
Riemenschneider v. Fritz Reuter Altenheim , 146 N.J. Super. 123 ( 1977 )