UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND HONORABLE KAREN M. WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION AND PARTICIPATING FOOD INDUSTRY EMPLOYERS TRI-STATE HEALTH AND Civil Action WELFARE FUND, et al., No. 1:23-CV-03226-KMW-AMD Plaintiffs, v. UNION ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEMORANDUM OPINION SERVICE, AND ORDER Defendant. THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of the Motion for Default Judgment of Trustees of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Health and Welfare Fund (“Plaintiff”); and THE COURT OBSERVING that on August 14, 2023, the Clerk of Court entered default against defendant Union Organization for Social Service (“Defendant”) for failing to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint; and THE COURT FURTHER OBSERVING that to obtain a default judgment against Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), Plaintiff must, among other things, produce sufficient proof of valid service of process and evidence establishing the Court’s jurisdiction, see Great Lakes Ins. SE v. Ross, 652 F. Supp. 3d 472, 477 (D.N.J. 2023); and THE COURT FINDING that Plaintiff has failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that Defendant has been properly served with copies of the Complaint and Summons1; IT IS this 15th day of April 2024 hereby ORDERED as follows: A) Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 8) is DENIED; B) The Clerk of Court’s Entry of Default against Defendant is VACATED; C) Plaintiff is granted leave to re-serve Defendant within ninety (90) days. /s/ Karen M. Williams KAREN M. WILLIAMS U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 1 In its Motion, Plaintiff claims that it hired a third-party agency to perform a corporate custodian search, which identified William Schiavinato as Defendant’s registered agent. A copy of the agency’s corporate search report, which is attached to Plaintiff’s Motion, indicates a “REVOKED” status beneath Mr. Schiavinato’s name, bringing into question the validity of his agency (ECF No. 8-5 at 5.) In addition, Plaintiff states that its process server left the Complaint and Summons with Mr. Schiavinato’s spouse at the couples’ Williamstown home (Id. at 7.) Even assuming that Mr. Schiavinato’s agency was valid, this is not how an unincorporated association is properly served under either federal or New Jersey law. See Trustees of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, Transportation Workers Int’l Ass’n Loc. 27 Annuity, Health & Welfare, Educ. & Suppplemental Unemployment Funds v. Cinnaminson Mech. Contractors, Inc., No. 22- 6068, 2024 WL 397734, at *3–*4 (D.N.J. Feb. 2, 2024) (recognizing that delivery of complaint and summons to spouse of registered agent at registered agent’s home was not proper service of process under FED. R. CIV. P. 4(h)(1)(B) or N.J. CT. R. 4:4-4(a)(5)).