Citation Numbers: 190 A.2d 205, 79 N.J. Super. 24
Judges: Judges Goldmann, Freund and Foley
Filed Date: 4/16/1963
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/9/2017
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.
Mr. Karl R. Meyertons argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Rafferty & Blacher, attorneys for appellant Borough of Middlesex; Mr. Louis J. Milano, attorney for appellant Borough of South River; Mr. Elia Barbati, Jr., attorney for appellants Borough of Bound Brook and Borough of South *25 Bound Brook; Mr. John J. Rafferty, of counsel for all appellants).
Mr. Edward J. Johnson, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Johnson & Johnson, attorneys; Mr. Edward J. Johnson, of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Cohen in his opinion reported at 74 N.J. Super. 591 (Law Div. 1962).
Ceva v. TP. OF RIVER VALE , 119 N.J. Super. 593 ( 1972 )
Newark v. North Jersey Dist. Water Sup. Comm. , 106 N.J. Super. 88 ( 1968 )
Notch View Associates v. Smith , 260 N.J. Super. 190 ( 1992 )
North Jersey Dist. Water Sup. v. Newark , 103 N.J. Super. 542 ( 1968 )
Ocean Seniors, LLC v. Tp. of Ocean Sewerage Auth. , 395 N.J. Super. 411 ( 2006 )
Chatlos Systems, Inc. v. National Cash Register Corp. , 479 F. Supp. 738 ( 1979 )
Pub. Serv. Elec. v. NJ DEPT. OF ENVIRON , 101 N.J. 95 ( 1985 )