Citation Numbers: 264 A.2d 257, 110 N.J. Super. 33
Judges: Judges Conford, Collester and Kolovsky
Filed Date: 4/24/1970
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/8/2017
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and KOLOVSKY.
Mr. Daniel R. Coburn, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
Mr. Robert L. Messick, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. A. Donald Bigley, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Peel in his opinion denying post-conviction relief. 105 N.J. Super. 194 (Law Div. 1969).
All other questions raised are concluded against defendant by the opinion (unreported) of this court affirming the conviction on the direct appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
State v. Laurick , 120 N.J. 1 ( 1990 )
State v. Clark , 162 N.J. 201 ( 2000 )
In Re Opinion 452 of the Advisory Committee on Professional ... , 87 N.J. 45 ( 1981 )
State v. Preciose , 129 N.J. 451 ( 1992 )
John Patrick Tully v. Edward Scheu, United States Marshal ... , 607 F.2d 31 ( 1979 )
State v. Williams , 284 N.J. Super. 142 ( 1995 )
SYRIAN ARCHDIOCESE OF NY v. Palisades Assoc. , 110 N.J. Super. 34 ( 1970 )
State v. Zold , 57 N.J. 131 ( 1970 )
Tully v. Scheu , 487 F. Supp. 404 ( 1980 )