DocketNumber: 30,746
Filed Date: 3/28/2011
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9 v. NO. 30,746 10 PATRICK MAZZEI, 11 Defendant-Appellant. 12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 13 Robert M. Schwartz, District Judge 14 Gary K. King, Attorney General 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellee 17 Fuentes & Associates, P.C. 18 Robert R. Fuentes 19 Rio Rancho, NM 20 for Appellant 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION 22 VIGIL, Judge. 23 Defendant appeals from a conditional plea and disposition agreement in which 24 he pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated driving under the influence (Fourth or 1 Subsequent Offense). [RP 115] This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to 2 dismiss Defendant’s appeal for lack of a final order. Specifically, we proposed to 3 conclude that because sentencing was left pending while the Defendant’s case was 4 referred to drug court, and because no final judgment and sentence was entered, 5 Defendant’s notice of appeal was premature. See State v. Garcia,99 N.M. 466
, 471, 6659 P.2d 918
, 923 (Ct. App. 1983) (holding that in a criminal case the final judgment 7 is the judgment and sentence or an order dismissing all charges against the defendant). 8 Defendant has filed a response to this Court’s notice of proposed summary 9 disposition. In his response, Defendant concurs with this Court’s proposed disposition 10 of dismissal. We therefore dismiss Defendant’s appeal as premature. Defendant may 11 re-file his appeal once a final judgment and sentence has been entered. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 _______________________________ 14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 15 WE CONCUR: 16 _________________________________ 17 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 18 _________________________________ 19 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 2