Citation Numbers： 5 N.E.2d 352, 272 N.Y. 602, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1093
Filed Date： 11/17/1936
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/12/2024
As to each defendant, judgment of conviction affirmed. The error in the judge’s charge as to the effect of a promise by the Assistant District Attorney did not in our opinion affect the substantial right of the defendants. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Finch, JJ. Dissenting as to defendants Kimmel, Bruno and Zizzo; Lehman and Loughran, JJ.