Citation Numbers: 666 N.E.2d 1359, 88 N.Y.2d 859, 644 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 685
Judges: Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick Concur
Filed Date: 5/2/1996
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Eugene R. Spada, Albany, for appellant.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City (Timothy J. Coleman, Rowan D. Wilson and Robert P. Pongetti of counsel), for respondents.
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur.
*860MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff in this malicious prosecution action bears the burden of establishing that the underlying criminal action terminated favorably to him (Ward v Silverberg, 85 N.Y.2d 993; Hollender v Trump Vil. Coop., 58 N.Y.2d 420; Martin v City of Albany, 42 N.Y.2d 13, 16). A criminal proceeding terminates favorably to the accused, for purposes of a malicious prosecution claim, when the final disposition of the proceeding involves the merits and indicates the accused's innocence (see, Hollender v Trump Vil. Coop., supra; Halberstadt v New York Life Ins. Co., 194 N.Y. 1).
In this case the information charging plaintiff with attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, theft of a credit card (Penal Law § 155.30 [4]; § 110.00), was dismissed by the court because it concluded that the facts alleged by the People were not legally sufficient to support the charge (CPL 170.30 [1] [a]; 170.35 [1] [a]). The People were at liberty to amend the information to correct the deficiency but did not do so. Neither did they refile the charge as they could have (see, People v Nuccio, 78 N.Y.2d 102, 104).
Manifestly, the criminal action was disposed of on procedural grounds. The court did not reach the merits and the question of plaintiff's guilt or innocence remained unanswered after the court dismissed the information. Accordingly, plaintiff's complaint in the civil action failed to state a cause of action for malicious prosecution and it was properly dismissed.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Lanning v. City of Glens Falls ( 2018 )
Hernandez v. City of Rochester , 260 F. Supp. 2d 599 ( 2003 )
Ahern v. City of Syracuse , 411 F. Supp. 2d 132 ( 2006 )
Kurschus v. PaineWebber, Inc. , 16 F. Supp. 2d 386 ( 1998 )
Alvin Fulton Jr. v. Laurie Robinson , 289 F.3d 188 ( 2002 )
Neal v. Fitzpatrick , 250 F. Supp. 2d 153 ( 2003 )
Mason v. Town of New Paltz Police Department , 103 F. Supp. 2d 562 ( 2000 )
Mangino v. Incorporated Village of Patchogue , 739 F. Supp. 2d 205 ( 2010 )
david-j-obrien-v-norman-e-alexander-stuart-z-krinsly-gerald-s , 101 F.3d 1479 ( 1996 )
Rivas v. Suffolk County , 326 F. Supp. 2d 355 ( 2004 )
Baer v. Sprint Long Distance , 60 F. Supp. 2d 209 ( 1999 )
Stampf v. Long Island Railroad , 761 F.3d 192 ( 2014 )
Manbeck v. Micka , 640 F. Supp. 2d 351 ( 2009 )
Velasquez v. City of New York , 960 F. Supp. 776 ( 1997 )
Tarantino v. City of Hornell , 615 F. Supp. 2d 102 ( 2009 )
ernesto-murphy-v-john-lynn-individually-and-as-a-town-of-clarkstown , 118 F.3d 938 ( 1997 )
Gerald M. Breen v. Shawn L. Garrison, Individually and as a ... , 169 F.3d 152 ( 1999 )
Willner v. Town of North Hempstead , 977 F. Supp. 182 ( 1997 )