Filed Date: 3/20/2008
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024
OPINION OF THE COURT
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Town of Rye and a Town of Rye taxpayer commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the State Board of Real Property Services’ decision not to establish a segment-special equalization rate for the City of Rye. Judicial review of
As we emphasized in Town of Riverhead, RPTL 1218 expressly limits those entitled to seek judicial review to directly affected municipalities whose own “rate or rates were established” by the State Board. Neither the Town nor the individual taxpayer falls within this class of parties. Next, assuming the individual taxpayer fulfills the requirements for common-law standing, jurisdiction to entertain an action based on common-law standing would lie in Supreme Court, not the Appellate Division. Finally, the individual taxpayer’s constitutional challenge to RPTL 1218 was not raised in the amended petition, and therefore is not preserved for our review.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.