Filed Date: 12/30/1959
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The defendant Alvich, convicted on a plea of guilty, was given a suspended sentence, placed on ‘ ‘ Indefinite Probation ” and required to undergo psychiatric treatment. More than a year later, the court, upon motion of the prosecutor, vacated the judgment, on the ground that the requirements of section 2189-a of the Penal Law had not been met and thereafter, in place of the original judgment, rendered a new one ordering the defendant’s imprisonment for a term of from two to four years.
Section 2189-a, enacted in 1950 after long and serious consideration of the problem of sex offenders, embodies a considered legislative policy in regard to the procedure to be adopted in
In the view which we have thus taken, we do not reach, and find it unnecessary to treat, the question whether the requirements of section 2189-a may be waived by either the defense or the prosecution.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the original judgment suspending* the defendant’s sentence reinstated.
Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.