Citation Numbers: 8 N.Y.2d 333, 170 N.E.2d 667, 207 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 886
Filed Date: 11/17/1960
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The reversal of the judgment of conviction by the County Court for the stated reason ‘‘ that the evidence produced on this trial fell far short of the minimal requirements ” is unwarranted, for such evidence establishes a violation of section 986 of the Penal Law beyond a reasonable doubt.
The proof of the possession of writings representing bets for nine races at different tracks, together with the money covering the bets, coupled with the admissions of the bettor and the defendant that the defendant had agreed “ to try to get the bets down”, justified the inference that defendant was engaged in a book-making transaction on a professional basis. Defendant argues that there must be proof of more than one transaction. A single transaction, he contends, is only eireum
Accordingly, the order of the Schenectady County Court should be reversed, the information reinstated and a new trial ordered.
Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster concur.
Order reversed, etc.