Judges: Bergan, Burke, Desmond, Fuld, Keating, Scileppi, Voorhis, Vote
Filed Date: 12/30/1966
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Before September 1, 1962, the petitioner was the “Secretary’’ to a Judge of the Bronx County Court. With court reorganization, effective on that date, the County Court
The petitioner’s original appointment as Secretary to a Judge of the Bronx County Court was made pursuant to section 206 of the Judiciary Law. That statute was repealed by section 44 of chapter 692 of the Laws of 1962, effective September 1, 1962, the date of the court reorganization. It was no coincidence that the office of Secretary to a Bronx County Court Judge was abolished on the same day that the Bronx County Court ceased to exist. In effecting court reorganization, the Constitution explicitly declared that, ‘ ‘ to the extent practicable ’ ’ and ‘ ‘ As may be provided by law”, nonjudicial personnel “shall * * * be assigned to like functions in the courts which exercise the jurisdiction formerly exercised by the courts in which they were employed” (N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 35, subd. 1). To implement this objective, the Legislature enacted section 223 of the Judiciary Law (subd. 1),. effective September 1, 1962, which provides that nonjudicial personnel shall be ‘ ‘ transferred to courts which exercise the jurisdiction formerly exercised by the courts in which they were employed, and appointed to positions in such courts where their skills, experience and training can be fully utilized. ’ ’ In our view, section 223 is self-executing and, as of September 1, 1962, the petitioner w-as,. in effect,•, “appointed” to the position most analogous to Secretary to a Bronx County Judge, namely, Clerk to a Supreme Court Justice in the First Judicial District. (See Judiciary LaW; § 157, subd. 1.) Accordingly, he was entitled to be compensated from September 1, 1962 to July 1, 1963 at the rate of pay for a Supreme Court Clerk instead of a County Court Secretary.
Our decision in Matter of Rein v. Wagner (18 N Y 2d 989), also handed down today, supports the conclusion! that, under
The order appealed from should be reversed, with costs.
Order reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate; Division, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion, herein.