Filed Date: 11/9/1984
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Martin J. Mack, Esq. County Attorney, Cortland County
You have asked whether it is a conflict of interest for a county real property tax director to also engage in business as a real estate broker.
The development of ethics standards to define when private employment is in conflict with the official duties of a local government officer or employee has been left to the governing body of the municipality (General Municipal Law, §
Under section
In our view, it is highly inadvisable for a real estate broker to serve as the director of real property tax services for the county wherein he operates as a broker. In preparing appraisals and providing advice to assessors on property where he also served as a broker, the person is faced with a conflict between his official duties and allegiances owed to the buyer or seller of the property, that may affect his independent judgment. Public officials should avoid private employment which compromises their ability to make impartial judgments solely in the public interest. Even the appearance of impropriety should be avoided in order to maintain public confidence in government.
A municipal code of ethics should include standards that define and prohibit private conduct in conflict with official duties. In determining whether a disqualifying conflict exists, the county should take into consideration the extent of the person's brokerage business within the county. Where substantial conflicts are inevitable, the county should act to prohibit its real property tax director from engaging in such private employment.
We conclude that a local government should include in its code of ethics standards that define and prohibit private conduct in conflict with official duties. Where substantial conflicts are inevitable, a town should act to prohibit a director of real property tax services from engaging in business as a real estate broker in the county.