Filed Date: 7/13/1982
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Honorable Richard A. Berman Commissioner NYS Division of Housing and Community Renewal
Your counsel has asked whether officers and employees of your division who are officers of Safe Affordable Housing, Inc. ("SAHE"), a not-for-profit community development corporation, are covered by section
It is our understanding that SAHE was created under the Private Housing Finance Law and the Not-For-Profit Corporation Law to carry out an arrangement between your division and the New York State Urban Development Corporation ("UDC"), a State public benefit corporation, whereby the division becomes responsible for maintenance and management of Roosevelt Island, a developed community in the Borough of Manhattan. The island itself belongs to the City of New York and was leased to UDC which, through various subsidiary corporations, has developed the island. In a Memorandum of Understanding dated as of May 22, 1981, UDC designated your division as UDC's agent to carry out UDC's obligations to maintain and manage Roosevelt Island. On the same date, your division assigned its rights under the memorandum to SAHE and designated SAHE as the division's agent to carry out the division's obligations under the memorandum. It is also our understanding that UDC has transferred to your division the funds necessary for SAHE to maintain and manage Roosevelt Island.
Article 13 of the Certificate of Incorporation alone demonstrates that officers and directors of the corporation are not "acting within the scope of [their] public employment or duties" (Public Officers Law, §
We note that chapter 277 of the Laws of 1981 has added section 18 to the Public Officers Law. Section 18 authorizes "public entities" to indemnify its officers and employees by opting to be covered by section 18. The definition of "public entities" includes all the standard units of government except the State and any other public entity covered by section 17 (subd 1[a]). The only category which might be appropriate for SAHE is "any other separate corporate instrumentality or unit of government" (ibid.). We doubt that SAHE could qualify as a "separate corporate instrumentality" of government. We note that SAHE is a "community development corporation" authorized by Article 6-A of the Private Housing Finance Law. Nothing in that article makes the corporation "public". Furthermore, the Law Revision Commission, which sponsored section 18, noted that the purpose of the bill is to "confer, solely at local option, uniform defense and indemnification protections to all public employees not now covered by section 17" (emphasis supplied; Memorandum Relating to Indemnification and Defense of Public Officers and Employees, Legis. Doc. [1981] No. 65[E]).
SAHE, as a community development corporation, has the powers conferred on corporations by the Business Corporation Law (Private Housing Finance Law, §
We conclude that officers and directors of SAHE are not covered by either section