Filed Date: 3/19/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Donald J.
It is hereby ordered that the resentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: The contention of defendant that Supreme Court failed to abide by the terms of our remittal in resentencing him as a persistent felony offender (People v Johnson, 275 AD2d 949, 951 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 965 [2000]) is not preserved for our review (see People v Proctor, 79 NY2d 992 [1992]; People v Hernandez, 273 AD2d 176 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 890, 935 [2000]; People v Banks, 265 AD2d 163 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 819 [1999]). In any event, defendant’s contention lacks merit.
Defendant contends in a pro se supplemental brief that the procedure pursuant to which he was resentenced as a persistent felony offender is unconstitutional. That contention is not preserved for our review and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329, 334-335 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]). We conclude that defendant’s remaining contention in the pro se supplemental brief also is without merit. Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.