Citation Numbers: 3 A.D.3d 428, 770 N.Y.S.2d 621
Filed Date: 1/22/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
The court properly granted the prosecutor’s request for a missing witness charge with respect to defendant’s wife, who was in a position to provide material, noncumulative testimony, in that the evidence established that she accompanied defendant throughout the time period at issue (see People v Hagans, 306 AD2d 149 [2003]).
Even assuming that some of the prosecutor’s voir dire questions to prospective jurors about their knowledge of, and attitudes toward, drug trafficking were inappropriate (see People v Byrd, 284 AD2d 201 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 679 [2001]), these questions could not have caused any prejudice to defendant. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.