Citation Numbers: 5 A.D.3d 153, 772 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2240
Filed Date: 3/4/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered August 30, 2002, which denied defendant Tri State Auto’s motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
By waiving its equitable claims and retaining only its contract cause of action, plaintiff met the sum-certain requirement for default judgment under CPLR 3215 (a) (cf. Geer, Du Bois & Co. v Scott & Sons Co., 25 AD2d 423 [1966]). Plaintiff had acquired jurisdiction over Tri State by service pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 306, and Tri State failed to raise a nonconclusory factual issue warranting a traverse hearing (see Chinese Consol. Benevolent Assn. v Tsang, 254 AD2d 222 [1998]). With the insufficiency of its jurisdictional challenge, Tri State was required to set forth both a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense (Perez v Villa Josefa Realty Corp., 293 AD2d 306 [2002]). Tri State’s failure to set forth a reasonable excuse rendered it unnecessary for the court to consider whether there was a meritorious defense (see Ortiz v Santiago, 303 AD2d 1, 6 [2003]). Denial of vacatur was a provident exercise of the court’s discretion.