Filed Date: 3/30/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
The finding that petitioner subjected an individual to sexual contact without her consent is supported by substantial evidence, including, in particular, the victim’s testimony. No basis exists to disturb respondent’s findings of credibility (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). The penalty does not shock our sense of fairness. We note petitioner’s plea of guilty to another specification charging him with illegal use of a cable box. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.