Citation Numbers: 5 A.D.3d 343, 772 N.Y.S.2d 529
Filed Date: 3/1/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. In support of their respective motions, the defendants presented evidence establishing that the concrete wheel stop on which the injured plaintiff tripped while leaving a store carrying a box containing a computer monitor was not an inherently dangerous condition and was readily observable by the reasonable use of one’s senses (see Cupo v Karfunkel, 1 AD3d 48 [2003]; Gibbons v Lido & Point Lookout Fire Dist., 293 AD2d 646 [2002]; Plessias v Scalia Home for Funerals, 271 AD2d 423 [2000]). In response to the motions, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.