Citation Numbers: 6 A.D.3d 249, 774 N.Y.S.2d 337, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4523
Filed Date: 4/15/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
The evidence that at the time of the incident the entrance to the building in which plaintiff was allegedly assaulted was not equipped with a working door lock, along with plaintiff’s testimony identifying his assailants as local gang members who did not reside in the building, was sufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether plaintiffs harm was attributable to a failure by defendant landlords to take minimal precautions to secure their premises against intruders (see Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp., 92 NY2d 544, 550-551 [1998]; Cruz v Gibraltar Invs., 247 AD2d 335 [1998]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Williams, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.