Citation Numbers: 6 A.D.3d 639, 775 N.Y.S.2d 183
Filed Date: 4/26/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the alleged condition which caused the injured plaintiff to fall was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous (see Cupo v Karfunkel, 1 AD3d 48 [2003]; Pedersen v Kar, Ltd., 283 AD2d 625 [2001]; Canetti v AMCI, Ltd., 281 AD2d 381 [2001]; Wint v Fulton St. Art Gallery, 263 AD2d 541 [1999]; Binensztok v Marshall Stores, 228 AD2d 534 [1996]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.