Filed Date: 11/17/2003
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
— In a
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the mother’s contention, the petitioner agency met its burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that despite its diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, she permanently neglected the child by failing to plan for her future (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136 [1984]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 NY2d 368 [1984]).
Further, the Family Court’s finding that it was in the child’s best interests to terminate the mother’s parental rights and free her for adoption is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Star Leslie W., supra at 147-148).
The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.E, McGinity, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.