Citation Numbers: 7 A.D.3d 630, 775 N.Y.S.2d 900
Filed Date: 5/10/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The new duties required of the petitioners by their employer were “reasonably related” to and a “logical extension” of the other duties enumerated in their title specification and thus did not constitute out-of-title work (see Matter of Gavigan v McCoy, 37 NY2d 548, 551 [1975]; Matter of Gergis v Governor’s Off. of Empl. Relations, 206 AD2d 766 [1994]; Glasbrenner v Bellacosa, 139 AD2d 491 [1988]; Court Officers Benevolent Assn. of Nassau County v Sise, 127 AD2d 625 [1987]). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding.
In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to address the petitioners’ remaining contention. Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.