Citation Numbers: 7 A.D.3d 816, 776 N.Y.S.2d 890
Filed Date: 5/24/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly found, after a hearing, that the pretrial identification procedures were not unduly suggestive (see People v Bolt, 295 AD2d 357 [2002]; People v Foster, 272 AD2d 410 [2000]; People v Baptiste, 201 AD2d 659 [1994]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., H. Miller, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.