Citation Numbers: 10 A.D.3d 795, 782 N.Y.S.2d 467, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10972
Filed Date: 9/23/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Initially, petitioner’s challenges to the sufficiency of two of the misbehavior reports are unpreserved for our review because petitioner failed to raise them at the disciplinary hearing (see Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Health, 96 NY2d 879, 880 [2001]). Similarly, petitioner’s assertion of hearing officer bias has not been preserved since it was not raised on administrative appeal (see id. at 880; see generally Matter of Hodge v Goord, 280 AD2d 767, 767 [2001]). Finally, inasmuch as petitioner was informed at the hearing of the penalty to be imposed and was provided a corrected copy of the hearing disposition, we reject his challenge to the sufficiency of the penalty notice (see generally Matter of Richards v Kuhlmann, 251 AD2d 939, 940 [1998]).
Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.