Citation Numbers: 11 A.D.3d 407, 785 N.Y.S.2d 416, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12704
Filed Date: 10/28/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Given the unusual circumstances of this case and the important questions defendants in the underlying action raise as to the validity of the jury verdict, all court exhibits including court exhibit 19 should be made available to all counsel despite respondent Justice’s contention that the release of exhibit 19 is discretionary because it is the court’s work product. Counsel for respondent Justice’s argument ignores the fact that exhibit 19 has already been seen by counsel at a court conference at which time the court marked the document as a court exhibit. Moreover, defendants in the underlying action raise valid questions as to how the court personnel obtained the information contained in this verdict sheet. These defendants maintain, and we agree, that this Court exhibit is necessary for them to prepare posttrial motions to set aside the verdict and to make a complete record for subsequent appellate review.
Defendants in the underlying action are also entitled to an extension of time to prepare their respective posttrial motions to the extent indicated. .Concur—Lerner, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.