Citation Numbers: 11 A.D.3d 461, 782 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11555
Filed Date: 10/4/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
In a consolidated proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 to review certain real property tax assessments on the petition
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that it failed to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the subject property was overassessed (see Matter of Fourth Garden Park v Assessor of Town of Riverhead, 271 AD2d 531 [2000]; Matter of City of Troy v Kusala, 227 AD2d 736 [1996]).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.