Citation Numbers: 15 A.D.3d 312, 790 N.Y.S.2d 106, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1935
Filed Date: 2/24/2005
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
The courtroom was properly closed to the general public during the undercover officer’s testimony. The People made a sufficiently particularized showing to warrant closure in that the officer expected to resume undercover work in the area of defendant’s arrest at the conclusion of her maternity leave, she had open cases, lost subjects and pending trials in connection with her undercover activities, she had seen some of her arrest subjects in the area of the courthouse, and she took precautions when testifying (see People v Ramos, 90 NY2d 490, 498-499 [1997], cert denied sub nom. Ayala v New York, 522 US 1002 [1997]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.