Citation Numbers: 15 A.D.3d 839, 788 N.Y.S.2d 769, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1153
Filed Date: 2/4/2005
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Donald J. Mark, J.), rendered August 22, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of marihuana in the fourth degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and criminal sale of marihuana in the fourth degree (§ 221.40). Defendant contends that reversal is required because Supreme Court erred in admitting testimony explaining why the prerecorded “buy” money was not discovered on his person when he was arrested. We note that defendant objected to the testimony of only one of the three police officers who so testified at trial. In any event, even assuming, arguendo, that defendant’s contention is preserved for our review, we conclude that any error in the admission of the testimony is harmless. The evidence of defendant’s guilt apart from that testimony is overwhelming, and there is no significant probability that defendant otherwise would have been acquitted (see People v Smith, 2 NY3d 8, 12-13 [2004]; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]).