Filed Date: 4/5/2005
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Judgment, Supreme
The court properly denied defendant’s motion for reassignment of counsel. Defendant did not seek to elaborate on the conclusory allegations contained in his standard form motion, and his moving papers did not contain any serious complaint about counsel requiring an inquiry by the court (see People v Sides, 75 NY2d 822 [1990]).
Defendant’s remaining argument is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.