Filed Date: 4/21/2005
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
The People did not file a predicate felony statement and the court never adjudicated defendant a second felony offender. Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that a remand for resentencing is warranted in the interest of justice (compare People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140 [1985]). We further note and, as the People concede, since the crimes for which the DNA databank fee was imposed were committed before the effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [e]) providing for the imposition of such fees, that fee should not have been imposed. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.