Filed Date: 4/11/2005
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A defendant seeking to vacate a default in appearing or answering must demonstrate a justifiable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Westchester Med. Ctr. v ELRAC, Inc., 301 AD2d 518 [2003]; Cilindrello v Rayabin, 297 AD2d 699 [2002]). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the sound discretion of the trial court (see Matter of Gambardella v Ortov Light., 278 AD2d 494 [2000]; Parker v City of New York, 272 AD2d 310 [2000]). We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendants satisfied their burden. Their unintentional default was minimal, and they demonstrated a meritorious defense that their heater was not responsible for the subject fire. H. Miller, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.