Filed Date: 10/8/1957
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Order so far as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. Considering only the original papers submitted on the application for the warrant of attachment, sufficient was shown therein to sustain such attachment. The order denying the motion to vacate the warrant of attachment is affirmed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Botein, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ. [See post, p. 946.]