Judges: Bergan, Coon, Foster, Gibson, Halpern
Filed Date: 12/19/1957
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Appeal by employer and carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which awarded total disability benefits payable to the committee of the incompetent employee. The board has found causal relationship between the employee’s mental illness and an employment connected accident, and the only issue raised by appellants is that such a finding is not supported by substantial evidence. The employee worked as a cleaner, and on November 23, 1949, he was assaulted by a coemployee, who hit him on the head with seme object, knocked him down and kicked him in the head. The employee suffered injuries consisting of a deep laceration below the right eye, multiple abrasions of the face particularly involving the orbital regions, a concussion of the brain, a nasal fracture and a rupture of the right ear drum. He was hospitalized until January 3, 1950, and returned to work on January 6, 1950. On December 15, 1949, he was examined by an ear specialist, who continued to treat him for a year thereafter. The doctor testified that the employee never showed any evidence of hysterical reactions, and was very co-operative. On December 31, 1949, he was examined by a neurologist, Dr. Ayer, on behalf of the carrier. He testified that the employee may have suffered a brain concussion, but of only a temporary nature. He also testified that the employee was nervous, depressed and humiliated by the assault so that he would not see his friends, locked himself in his house and felt ashamed to return to his employment in the hotel where he was assaulted. On February 11, 1951, the employee ceased working, and two days later he was admitted to the Syracuse Psychopathic Hospital. After a staff examination there he was found to be suffering from dementia praeeox, paranoid type. While in this hospital he was examined by Dr. Steckel, a psychiatrist, on behalf of the carrier. This doctor testified there was no causal relationship of the employee’s condition to the assault; that the employee may have suffered a temporary emotional upset at the time of the assault, but that the employee’s history indicated existence of dementia praeeox