Judges: Bergan, Coon, Foster, Gibson, Halpern
Filed Date: 12/19/1957
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, holding that the claimant was not eligible for benefits for a period beginning October 3, 1955. The claimant was graduated from law school in 1954 and was admitted to practice in New York State in October, 1955. Following her graduation from law school, the claimant worked for various periods as a librarian, as a clerk in the trust department of a bank and as an assistant editor of a law publishing firm. She was discharged from this last employment on May 27, 1955, because of excessive absence due to illness. At that time, she was in her fourth month of pregnancy. Claimant filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits commencing June 6, 1955, and benefits were allowed. However, the Industrial Commissioner later ruled that the appellant was ineligible for benefits, as of October 3, 1955, on the ground that the claimant had shown “no active attachment to the labor market ”. At that time the claimant was in the eighth month of pregnancy. At a hearing before the referee, the initial determination was overruled. The referee found that, although the claimant was pregnant, she was in good health and was able to work and would be capable of working until the date of her confinement, which was expected to be November 18, 1955. The referee also found that the claimant had made reasonably diligent efforts to find work in a law office. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed the decision of the referee and held the claimant ineligible for benefits commencing October 3, 1955, on the ground (1) that her pregnancy rendered her unable to perform the usual duties of her employment and (2) that she had failed to exert reasonable efforts to obtain employment. We find no substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s conclusion. As to the first ground, the evidence demonstrated that the claimant's pregnancy did not interfere with her ability to perform the kind of work in which she had been engaged. Her work was primarily of