Filed Date: 12/28/2006
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
The Special Referee’s findings that defendants committed contempt are substantially supported in the record (see Melnitzky v Uribe, 33 AD3d 373 [2006]; United States Trust Co. of N.Y. v Olsen, 194 AD2d 481 [1993]). Defendants violated the court’s written orders of February 6, February 7 and April 1, 2003, all of which had directed them to produce documents requested by plaintiff; furthermore, their dilatory and disorganized production of these documents prejudiced plaintiff, causing it to incur additional expenses and attorneys’ fees (see Children’s Vil. v Greenburgh Eleven Teachers’ Union Fedn. of Teachers, Local 1532, AFT, AFL-CIO, 249 AD2d 435 [1998]).
The award to plaintiff for attorneys’ fees was appropriate (see Judiciary Law § 773). However, upon our review of the record, including the detailed billing records provided by plaintiff and testimony at the hearing, we find $285,000 more properly reflects plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees incurred as a result of defendants’ contempt (cf. Glanzman v Fischman, 143 AD2d 880, 881 [1988], lv dismissed 74 NY2d 792 [1989]).
We have considered the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sullivan and Sweeny, JJ.