Citation Numbers: 47 A.D.3d 541, 849 N.Y.S.2d 435
Filed Date: 1/29/2008
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.),
Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. The van at issue was an “inclosed motor truck,” and it met the definition of a “building” under Penal Law § 140.00 (2) and § 140.20 (see People v Mincione, 66 NY2d 995, 997 [1985]; People v Silva, 122 AD2d 750 [1986]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Acosta, JJ.