Filed Date: 10/7/2008
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff underwent an abdominoplasty on September 7, 2004 and the defendant insurer denied coverage for the procedure. More than two years later, on April 24, 2007, the plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover damages for breach of the subject medical insurance contract. Since the insurance contract required such an action to be instituted within two years after the date the disputed medical service was performed, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as time-barred. Parties to a contract may agree to limit the period of time within which an action must be commenced to a shorter period than that provided by the applicable statute of limitations (see CPLR 201; Blitman Constr. Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. Am., 66 NY2d 820 [1985]; Minichello v Northern Assur. Co. of Am., 304 AD2d 731 [2003]; Schunk v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 237 AD2d 913, 914 [1997]; Saxena v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 232 AD2d 622, 623 [1996]).
Further, contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, there is no evidence in the record of any conduct on the part of the defendant insurer that induced the plaintiff into delaying commencement of the action (see Spirig v Evans, 26 AD3d 425, 426 [2006]). Mastro, J.P, Lifson, Garni and Eng, JJ., concur.