Citation Numbers： 57 A.D.3d 550, 867 N.Y.2d 702
Filed Date： 12/2/2008
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/1/2024
The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in revoking the original order of disposition which placed the appellant on probation. The presentment agency adduced “competent proof that the [appellant] without just cause failed to comply with [the] terms and conditions” of her probation (Family Ct Act § 779).
The appellant’s contention with respect to her placement is academic inasmuch as the placement has expired pursuant to its terms (see Matter of Joseph R., 49 AD3d 651 [2008]; Matter of Jeffrey McG., 8 AD3d 571 [2004]; Matter of Angelina S., 304 AD2d 833, 833-834 [2003]). Fisher, J.E, Balkin, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ., concur.