Filed Date: 3/17/2009
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene R.
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). The combination of defendant’s suspiciously evasive conduct, the officer’s observation that defendant was carrying what was at the least a large and possibly dangerous knife, and defendant’s acknowledgment, in response to a proper common-law inquiry, that he had a knife, permitted the officer to conduct a self-protective frisk (see People v Batista, 88 NY2d 650, 654 [1996]; People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267, 271 [1980]; see also People v King, 102 AD2d 710 [1984], affd 65 NY2d 702 [1985]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.