Filed Date: 9/15/2009
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024
Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal dated April 29, 2008, is deemed to be a notice of appeal by the maternal grandmother, Jacqueline McD. (see CPLR 2001; Matter of Tagliaferri v Weiler, 1 NY3d 605 [2004]); and it is further,
Ordered that the order of fact-finding is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner established a prima facie case of abuse against the appellant by introducing evidence demonstrating that while the child Ahmad C. was under her care he suffered injuries of such a nature as would ordinarily not happen except by an act or omission of the appellant (see Family Court Act § 1046 [a] [ii]; Matter of Philip M., 82 NY2d 238 [1993]). Specifically, the petitioner presented proof that the child sustained a left parietal diastatic skull fracture, bilateral subdural hemorrhages, and diffuse retinal hemorrhages in both eyes. In response, the appellant failed to rebut the presumption of culpability with a credible and reasonable explanation of how the child sustained the injuries (see Matter of Philip M., 82 NY2d at 244-245; Matter of T’Yanna M., 27 AD3d 472, 473 [2006]).
Further, the Family Court’s finding of derivative neglect against the appellant with respect to the child Aaliyah R. is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The evidence of abuse of the child Ahmad C. demonstrates such an impaired level of judgment by the appellant as to create a substantial risk of harm for any child in her care (see Matter of Brian I., 51 AD3d 792, 793 [2008]).
Finally, contrary to the appellant’s contention, her attorney provided her with meaningful representation (see Matter of Alfred C., 237 AD2d 517 [1997]). Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.